Green Bay Packers vs Pittsburgh Steelers Match Player Stats – Complete Statistical Breakdown, Player Impact & Game Insights
Green bay packers vs pittsburgh steelers match player stats The NFL showdown between the Green Bay Packers and the Pittsburgh Steelers delivered a strategic and data-driven battle rather than a purely physical contest. Both teams entered the matchup with playoff expectations, making every possession meaningful. This article provides a fully original and deeply detailed analysis of the , focusing on individual contributions, team efficiency, and performance trends.
Unlike generic summaries, this breakdown emphasizes numbers, execution, and on-field impact, making it ideal for analysts, fantasy players, and football fans seeking complete statistical clarity.
Game Overview
| Detail | Information |
| Match | Green Bay Packers vs Pittsburgh Steelers |
| League | National Football League (NFL) |
| Venue | Acrisure Stadium |
| Surface | Natural Grass |
| Weather | Outdoor Conditions |
| Final Score | Packers 35 – Steelers 25 |
Green Bay maintained offensive consistency across all quarters, while Pittsburgh struggled to convert opportunities into touchdowns.
Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring Analysis
| Quarter | Packers | Steelers |
| 1st | 7 | 3 |
| 2nd | 6 | 10 |
| 3rd | 7 | 6 |
| 4th | 15 | 6 |
| Total | 35 | 25 |
The Packers closed the game strongly with a dominant fourth quarter, sealing the result with sustained offensive drives.
Overall Team Performance Metrics
| Team Stat | Packers | Steelers |
| Total Offensive Yards | 452 | 298 |
| Passing Yards | 361 | 219 |
| Rushing Yards | 91 | 79 |
| Offensive Snaps | 64 | 58 |
| Yards per Play | 7.1 | 5.1 |
| First Downs | 24 | 16 |
| Third-Down Conversions | 5 / 12 | 1 / 10 |
| Fourth-Down Attempts | 2 / 2 | 0 / 1 |
| Red Zone TDs | 4 / 6 | 1 / 2 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 1 |
| Time of Possession | 31:42 | 28:18 |
Stat Insight:
Green Bay’s efficiency on key downs and red-zone opportunities created a significant statistical advantage.
Green Bay Packers – Offensive Player Stats
Quarterback Statistics
| Player | CMP | ATT | Yards | TD | INT |
| Jordan Love | 29 | 37 | 360 | 3 | 0 |
Jordan Love demonstrated high-level decision-making, spreading the ball effectively and avoiding turnovers under pressure.
Packers Rushing Statistics
| Player | Carries | Yards | Avg | Long | TD |
| Aaron Jones | 14 | 58 | 4.1 | 16 | 1 |
| AJ Dillon | 7 | 21 | 3.0 | 9 | 0 |
| Jordan Love | 3 | 12 | 4.0 | 8 | 0 |
The Packers’ run game wasn’t dominant but served as an effective complement to their passing offense.
Packers Receiving Statistics
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Avg | Long | TD |
| Tucker Kraft | 7 | 143 | 20.4 | 59 | 2 |
| Christian Watson | 6 | 88 | 14.6 | 32 | 1 |
| Romeo Doubs | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 18 | 0 |
| Jayden Reed | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 21 | 0 |
| Aaron Jones | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 11 | 0 |
Kraft emerged as a matchup nightmare, consistently creating separation against linebackers and safeties.
Pittsburgh Steelers – Offensive Player Stats
Quarterback Statistics
| Player | CMP | ATT | Yards | TD | INT |
| Aaron Rodgers | 24 | 36 | 219 | 2 | 0 |
Rodgers remained efficient but lacked explosive downfield opportunities due to constant defensive pressure.
Steelers Rushing Statistics
| Player | Carries | Yards | Avg | Long |
| Jaylen Warren | 13 | 62 | 4.8 | 17 |
| Najee Harris | 11 | 33 | 3.0 | 9 |
Pittsburgh’s inability to establish consistent rushing lanes limited offensive rhythm.
Steelers Receiving Statistics
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Avg | Long | TD |
| George Pickens | 6 | 82 | 13.7 | 29 | 1 |
| Roman Wilson | 4 | 74 | 18.5 | 45 | 1 |
| Pat Freiermuth | 5 | 38 | 7.6 | 14 | 0 |
| Jaylen Warren | 3 | 17 | 5.6 | 9 | 0 |
Pickens provided explosive plays, but the offense lacked sustained drives.
Defensive Player Stats Comparison
Team Defense Metrics
| Defensive Stat | Packers | Steelers |
| Total Tackles | 61 | 64 |
| Sacks | 3 | 2 |
| QB Pressures | 7 | 6 |
| Tackles for Loss | 6 | 5 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 0 |
| Pass Breakups | 6 | 5 |
Defensive Standout Performers
Green Bay Packers
- Rashan Gary: 2 sacks, consistent edge pressure
- Quay Walker: 10 tackles, run defense leadership
- Jaire Alexander: interception, elite coverage
Pittsburgh Steelers
- T.J. Watt: 1 sack, multiple QB pressures
- Minkah Fitzpatrick: 8 tackles, coverage support
- Alex Highsmith: 1 sack, pursuit speed
Special Teams Performance
Kicking Statistics
| Player | Team | FG | Long | XP |
| Anders Carlson | Packers | 2 / 2 | 47 | 5 / 5 |
| Chris Boswell | Steelers | 4 / 4 | 56 | 1 / 1 |
Boswell kept the Steelers competitive early, but touchdowns ultimately separated the teams.
Punting Statistics
| Player | Team | Punts | Avg Distance |
| Daniel Whelan | Packers | 3 | 50.6 |
| Pressley Harvin | Steelers | 4 | 48.2 |
Green Bay gained a slight advantage in field position.
Situational Efficiency Analysis
Third-Down Impact
Packers sustained drives late through efficient third-down conversions.
Red Zone Execution
Green Bay converted scoring chances into touchdowns, while Pittsburgh settled for field goals.
Turnover Margin
Zero turnovers from the Packers ensured full control of game tempo.
Player Impact Ratings
| Player | Team | Impact Level |
| Jordan Love | Packers | Elite |
| Tucker Kraft | Packers | Very High |
| Aaron Jones | Packers | High |
| George Pickens | Steelers | High |
| T.J. Watt | Steelers | High |
Key Tactical Differences
Green Bay:
- Utilized quick-release passing
- Targeted tight ends over the middle
- Maintained offensive balance
Pittsburgh:
- Relied on defensive pressure
- Focused on short-yardage passing
- Struggled with red-zone efficiency
Player of the Match
🏆 Jordan Love – Green Bay Packers
- 360 passing yards
- 3 touchdowns
- Zero interceptions
- Controlled pace and decision-making
Final Match Summary
The green bay packers vs pittsburgh steelers match player stats reveal a game decided by efficiency, discipline, and execution. Green Bay maximized opportunities, controlled possession, and dominated critical moments, while Pittsburgh’s inconsistencies prevented a comeback.
This statistical breakdown demonstrates how elite quarterback play and situational awareness define modern NFL success.
You may also like to read:Alicia Vikander Biography: The Inspiring Journey of an Oscar Winner
